Bought 25 balls of this dark, dark Rowan Denim (color 225 Nashville) a couple of years ago, but I've been too intimidated to use it.
Would it be hard on my hands?
Would it stain my hands and clothes?
Would the fabric look good?
I want to make a classic fisherman's sweater, so I know there will be an investment of my time and energy, which I don't want to regret.
Then I bought the 2.5 lb cone of Light Indigo on EBay. It's a no-name honkin' big whack of denim yarn that the seller told me she bought from Elann way back when. Seems enough for another adult sweater.
Then, this past summer, Elann goes and brands their mill-direct yarn as Den-M-Nit. I bought enough in Mid Indigo to make a Miss Bea sweater for Emily.
So.... are they really all the same? They're all are made up of six twisted strands of over-dyed cotton with a white core.They spec 5 st/in (the cone has no specs). But, are they really the same gauge? I've seen the Rowan advertised with a 20% shrinkage and the Den-M-Nit with 10-15%. Will they shrink the same? (Can one type "shrinkage" without thinking of Seinfeld?)
How to answer these pressing questions?
Cast on 30 stitches onto 4 mm Addi Turbos (US #6).
Knit four rows garter.
Knit 39 rows st st with 3 stitch garter borders.
Knit 4 rows garter.
Cast off on wrong side row.
Repeat three times slam-bam-right-in-a-row: same needles, same chair, same morning - all variables controlled as much as reasonable.
Measure swatches.
Count stitches and rows.
Wash warm & dry medium with jeans and khakis. (Included color-catcher sheet, which turned dark but no die transferred to clothes.)
Measure again.
Blog.
Pre-wash & Post-wash (l to r: Rowan, Den-M-Nit, Cone)
Pure luck that each one shrunk to a near perfect square! Pure dumb "that looks like a good number of rows, I think I'll cast off" luck. See, the knitting gods look after you when you swatch!
Manufacturer Specs:
93 m, 50 gr, 20 st/10 cm on 4 mm, 20% length shrinkage (est. % from The Knitting Garden)
Swatch:
Prewash 4x4" st st = 20.5 stitches x 28 rows
Prewash total st st area (24 st x 39 rows) = 4 5/8" x 5 5/8"
Postwash 4x4" st st = 20.5 x 34 rows
Postwash total st st area = 4 5/8" x 4 5/8"
Shrinkage = 17.8% of row height of st st area
Impressions:
This one had the stiffest hand, but that didn't really affect knitting speed or comfort and I stopped noticing it quickly. This may just be because it has the most dye. It softened quite a bit in the first wash, but I can still id each of the three with my eyes closed.
The dye did slightly stain my fingers while knitting, but not my clothes. Washed off easily.
This photo shows the pre-wash yarn lying on the post-wash swatch. The two end yarns show how the core is exposed. The swatch is still very dark - this is in direct sun.
Overall, it's a beautiful fabric with a very even stitch.
Manufacturer Specs:
92 m, 50 gr, 20 st/10 cm on 4 mm, 10-15% length shrinkage
Swatch:
Prewash 4x4" st st = 21 stitches x 28 rows
Prewash total st st area (24 st x 39 rows) = 4 1/2" x 5 1/2"
Postwash 4x4" st st = 21.5 x 34 rows
Postwash total st st area = 4 1/2" x 4 1/2"
Shrinkage = 18.2% of row height of st st area
Impressions:
This one felt slightly thinner than the Rowan, which was realized in the stitch/inch count. Minor difference, but I'm not sure I'd combine this yarn with a Rowan Denim in the same pattern (was considering it for a Miss Bea pattern).
Almost no staining on my fingers with this color.
Again, this is also a beautiful fabric with a very even stitch.
Important to note how far off their shrinkage estimate is. Obviously, your mileage may vary, but I'd recommend a good swatching or you may end up with a too-short sweater.
Swatch:
Prewash 4x4" st st = 20 stitches x 27 rows
Prewash total st st area (24 st x 39 rows) = 4 5/8" x 5 3/4"
Postwash 4x4" st st = 20.5 x 34 rows
Postwash total st st area = 4 5/8" x 4 3/4"
Shrinkage = 17.4% of row height of st st area
Impressions:
This one felt slightly thicker than the Rowan, which showed up in the stitch/inch count. It was also the softest of the three to knit. Again, minor differences, but I wouldn't combine this yarn with the others.
Almost no staining on my fingers with this color.
This is a nice fabric, but not quite as even as the other two. This one came the closest to the standard gauge of 20/4 in.
Here's all three again post-washing in natural light:
Sitting right here in front of me now they all look bluer. They definitely change tone with lamp vs natural light. The white core flecks look very natural in person -- just like jeans.
Final Analysis:
These are three different yarns that perform the same way. I've wondered in the past if they were all the same yarn - rolling out of the same mill with three different presentations and labels, but the same fiber under the wrapper. Well, the three yarns I have are not the same. But the yarn companies change mills and the mills make changes. This Rowan is at least 3 years old, the cone is probably at least that old too, while the Den-M-Nit is recent vintage. Biggest take-away is do your own swatching and washing before CO and be careful when combining brands.
These details aside, I LOVE this yarn -- all three versions. Just think of it ... a wash-n-dry hand-knit sweater that improves with wear! Beginning to understand the passion for this yarn shown over at Mason-Dixon.
If you've read this far and think I'm obsessive and have way too much time on my hands. Well ... no. OK, I'm obsessive. But I don't create these posts in a calm world. This entry has been my touchstone, my little window of sanity and extreme order as chaos has reigned around me. Not a room in this house has been untouched by little marauding hands. Homework has been done RIGHT BEHIND MY HEAD. Battles have been waged RIGHT BEHIND MY HEAD. I am getting very good at remaining above the fray. Until I don't.
Excellent science! Control of variables, measures by same hands, same treatment, VERY instructive results. I've only washed weird yarns, now I will wash all swatches.
Posted by: Laurie | September 14, 2005 at 04:02 AM
Thank you! So, it seems like all three are good yarns, with the Elann having a much better price (I'm sure) than the Rowan.
Posted by: Colleen | September 14, 2005 at 06:28 AM
See, I love the swatch. You learn so mcuh.
And I have to admit y'all with the denim are wearing me down. It looks gorgrous. Did it hurt your hands?
Posted by: Juno | September 14, 2005 at 06:30 AM
I love to swatch! I have, for years, passed over those yarns for the reasons you listed. I just wasn't sure. And I am a big lover of denim and all things blue. Thanks for the work, I might give in and try one of them after all. Now, to go look for that Den-m-knit.....
Posted by: Teresa C | September 14, 2005 at 06:50 AM
Wow, I can't believe how much they SHRUNK in the wash! So - do you think it's a folly to base gauge on a non-washed swatch?!?! I like all the colors, too - but especially the dark blue. Can't wait to see what you will make!
Posted by: Anne-Caroline | September 14, 2005 at 08:08 AM
Well thank you for the swatching. I think I'm beginning to see the swatching light, much in the same way Stephanie taught me the lessons of predrafting. I might have to reconsider that denim yarn.. oh and btw, love your stash :)
Posted by: Risa | September 14, 2005 at 09:13 AM
Very intersting post! I have a big cone of Den-m-knit that I've been wanting to do something with for awhile.
Posted by: Moni | September 14, 2005 at 10:09 AM
Wow--I have never been this scientific! I note that the row gauge comes out the same for all 3 swatches? And that's where the shrinkage is. Personally I wouldn't have a problem combining them. In the finished sweater, after washing and drying, I don't think there would be a noticeable difference.
So glad you enjoy the yarn. I liked it from the first but the passion didn't develop until my first sweater started really aging. Then I started to imagine how it would look if it had cables that were aging (textured stitches get 'whiter' faster than the background stitches; like the seams and pocket edges on jeans)....and then I became the nut you know today.
I'm told by Those in the Know that Rowan changed mills maybe 10 years ago, so that 'old' Rowan denim is slightly different from 'new' Rowan denim. The dark shade is definitely stiffer when you knit it (I know a denim lover who pre-washes hers so that it is pre-shrunk, pre-faded (no blue hands), and so she knows EXACTLY what her final gauge and measurements are going to be), and did you notice it's very shiny but then loses the shine in the first wash?
Anyhoo. This makes me so happy. Can't wait to see the fisherman sweater take shape. xoxo Kay
Posted by: Kay | September 14, 2005 at 10:40 AM
This is GOOD obsessive in my book. I love these comparisons, and am glad to hear that you had a nice experience with all three yarns. Keep the crazy coming! xox
Posted by: Julia | September 14, 2005 at 11:02 AM
Wonderful! Thank you so much for your hard work! I've been thinking hard about denim and might just have to get some now.
Posted by: Cara | September 14, 2005 at 03:32 PM
oh, this is fabulous. But still I'm going to put you on the spot, if you have an answer: I have the Denim People book and DO want to make some things in there. The price of the Rowan, however, is daunting. Do I dare make a substitution of the Elann? What would you do?
Posted by: Norma | September 14, 2005 at 06:33 PM
What a great little test!! Good thing to keep in our knitting notebooks!! What a good swatcher you are!!
Posted by: Susan | September 15, 2005 at 06:42 AM
And I will offer a "brava!" for being so serenely meticulous in the midst of the chaos of kid-dom!
Posted by: Jeanne | September 15, 2005 at 07:21 AM
wow - that is a really comprehensive write-up, I think I'll try the rowan one now (had always put it off as I wondered how it would wash up), thanks.
Posted by: jules | September 15, 2005 at 02:00 PM
THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!
I knit with the Rowan, a Miss Bea's seaside dress for my daughter. She was little so I just didn't worry about the shrinkage. We love it and I want another one but I want to adjust for size as she has grown. You're info is just what I needed with the whole shrinkage.
Posted by: Rev. Linda | September 15, 2005 at 05:29 PM
I always enjoy your blog but I don't think I have commented before. You did us all a great service with your consumer report on denim yarns! I bought a cone of the Elann Denim several years ago,and I am finally getting ready to put it to work.The first Rowan Denim book has some great patterns as well. Can't wait to see what you do with your three denim yarns.
Posted by: Laura | September 16, 2005 at 06:24 PM
What a neat experiment!! Personally, I really like the dark blue Rowan Denium.....very pretty!
Posted by: Kim | September 17, 2005 at 03:51 PM
What a great post!! Thank you for doing this (and I don't think you're obsessive at ALL! I wish I would have done something like this with a lot of projects that ended up unfinished and in a pile because I didn't know how much I hated the way the yarn worked up until I was halfway up the back - which I would of course, finish, hoping it would get better, somehow.
And I want to know the answer to Norma's question... would you say the elann is a good sub for the Rowan Denim?
Posted by: Kathy | September 20, 2005 at 08:09 AM
Thank you for sharing your "obsessiveness" - it's one sure way to good knitting. You've inspired me to take the time and do the same.
This post is truly good writing - again thanks for doing it and sharing!
Posted by: terry | September 21, 2005 at 04:40 PM
Great research. It's alway better when somone else does it so well!
Li
Posted by: Li_B | September 25, 2005 at 08:40 PM
I just wanted you to know that you're quickly becoming one of my favorite bloggers.. after seeing your (hehe.) Yarn Porn, I couldn't help myself to see the rest of your blog and what you're all about.
Anyway.. Just thought I'd drop a compliment or two your way : ) Loved this post.. but I also loved the rest I read too.. lol.
Posted by: Kim | September 27, 2005 at 01:11 AM
Nancy, you inspire me.
First, I love your stash photos, but more, you inspired me to swatch right.
I sat in LYS this afternoon and made a right and proper swatch - not the half-done thing I've been doing, to determine if the yarn I fell in love with would work for a sweater I don't need to start. It did, and I bought it - and now I'm going to start it!
Posted by: Marji | September 28, 2005 at 03:26 PM
Great post! About a month or so ago, I searched the internet in vain for something like this! I am knitting a Rowan pattern with Elann yarn, but have been stuck wondering about the different shrinkage percentages. Thanks for your tests!
Posted by: Diana | September 29, 2005 at 08:55 AM
Thank you for the analysis. I used your information when making a dress for my niece and it turned out lovely. Since then I have sent people to this site for your wonderful comparision. Thanks again!
Posted by: Florence | August 18, 2006 at 10:48 AM
Hi! I have been trying to reseach a sweater I was given over 15 years ago, and found your website. I love the wispy knitted items you've created!
Anyway, I worked as a Resident Director for a prep school here in San Antonio for 12 years, and it was then that I was given this sweater by one of the girls.
I am a mother of two girls...both have a genetic form of ricketts. Our oldest is in college and our younger Sarah has had to have multiple difficult osteotomies...therefore I sell on Ebay so that I can be with her and not have to work outside of the home.
THE QUESTION: (didn't think I'd get there!)
This absolutely wonderful sweater has a tag in it that reads: "Den-M-Nit, Indigo Cotton, Trademark, Indigo Dyed cotton, machine wash separately, this garment is fully shrunk and tumble drying is recommended to maintain this"
I've decided to sell it on Ebay...we've had one day of winter last year, and even our 'severe winters' can be summed up in numbers of days, not really a season! I just use scarves, and don't need sweaters this heavy.
I can email photos...it is not like any I have seen, and its texture and embellishments are entirely unique.
I do not know how to price it...I find sites like yours that describe the yarn, same name brand...but not tagged, retail products made with the yarn.
Does anyone know how to find out its value?
I can email photos!
Thank you!
Sandy Way
Posted by: Sandy Way | September 24, 2006 at 03:21 PM